ITCCS: Pope Benedict resigned to avoid arrest, seizure of church wealth by Easter

pope

By: The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (itccs.org)
Posted on February 13, 2013

Diplomatic Note was issued to Vatican just prior to his resignation
New Pope and Catholic clergy face indictment and arrest as “Easter Reclamation” plan continues
A Global Media Release and Statement from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

Brussels:

The historically unprecedented resignation of Joseph Ratzinger as Pope this week was compelled by an upcoming action by a European government to issue an arrest warrant against Ratzinger and a public lien against Vatican property and assets by Easter.

The ITCCS Central Office in Brussels is compelled by Pope Benedict’s sudden abdication to disclose the following details:

1. On Friday, February 1, 2013, on the basis of evidence supplied by our affiliated Common Law Court of Justice (itccs.org), our Office concluded an agreement with representatives of a European nation and its courts to secure an arrest warrant against Joseph Ratzinger, aka Pope Benedict, for crimes against humanity and ordering a criminal conspiracy.

2. This arrest warrant was to be delivered to the office of the “Holy See” in Rome on Friday, February 15, 2013. It allowed the nation in question to detain Ratzinger as a suspect in a crime if he entered its sovereign territory.

3. A diplomatic note was issued by the said nation’s government to the Vatican’s Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, on Monday, February 4, 2013, informing Bertone of the impending arrest warrant and inviting his office to comply. No reply to this note was received from Cardinal Bertone or his office; but six days later, Pope Benedict resigned.

4. The agreement between our Tribunal and the said nation included a second provision to issue a commercial lien through that nation’s courts against the property and wealth of the Roman Catholic church commencing on Easter Sunday, March 31, 2013. This lien was to be accompanied by a public and global “Easter Reclamation Campaign” whereby Catholic church property was to be occupied and claimed by citizens as public assets forfeited under international law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

5. It is the decision of our Tribunal and the said nation’s government to proceed with the arrest of Joseph Ratzinger upon his vacating the office of the Roman Pontiff on a charge of crimes against humanity and criminal conspiracy.

6. It is our further decision to proceed as well with the indictment and arrest of Joseph Ratzinger’s successor as Pope on the same charges; and to enforce the commercial lien and “Easter Reclamation Campaign” against the Roman Catholic church, as planned.

In closing, our Tribunal acknowledges that Pope Benedict’s complicity in criminal activities of the Vatican Bank (IOR) was compelling his eventual dismissal by the highest officials of the Vatican. But according to our sources, Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone forced Joseph Ratzinger’s resignation immediately, and in direct response to the diplomatic note concerning the arrest warrant that was issued to him by the said nation’s government on February 4, 2013.

We call upon all citizens and governments to assist our efforts to legally and directly disestablish the Vatican, Inc. and arrest its chief officers and clergy who are complicit in crimes against humanity and the ongoing criminal conspiracy to aid and protect child torture and trafficking.

Further bulletins on the events of the Easter Reclamation Campaign will be issued by our Office this week.

Issued 13 February, 2013
12:00 am GMT
by the Brussels Central Office

About these ads

Posted on February 12, 2013, in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Good day

    Re: http://itccs.org/2013/02/13/pope-benedict-resigned-to-avoid-arrest-seizure-of-church-wealth-by-easter/

    In behalf of Teacher Erano Martin Evangelista of http://www.thename.ph

    May i present to you an evidence that will truly prove that the Vatican- The Roman Catholic Church and all Religions had committed the greatest deception upon humanity and this is by making them believe that Jesus is a Son of God and was sent by God to die for our sins.

    Please be informed that the real Jesus- descendant of King David, was NOT sent by God to be beaten for our sins but was punished by God with the floggings and beatings of men for his OWN wrongdoing- we did not know this because the apostles hid this truth from us by distorting the word of God in the Prophecy in the Old Testament

    Based from the Bible revelations of Teacher Eraño Evangelista in the link:
    http://www.thename.ph/thename/revelations/greatestdeception-en.htm

    There is a Word of God about Jesus-the descendant/offspring of King David that we should know:
    2 Samuel 7:12-14 (NIV)
    12 When your days are over and you rest with your ancestors, I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, your own flesh and blood, and I will establish his kingdom. 13 He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. 14 I will be his father, and he will be my son. WHEN HE DOES WRONG, I WILL PUNISH HIM WITH A ROD WIELDED BY MEN, WITH FLOGGINGS INFLICTED BY HUMAN HANDS

    In the said verses: 2 Samuel 7:12-14 – we can read that God speaks of a coming offspring of David and not a literal “son of God” as what the religions preach.

    Is it really true that Jesus was a descendant of David?
    …to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. Luke 1:27 (NIV)
    Jesus’ true father is Joseph who belongs to the house of David. So if we are to believe the teaching of the religions that Jesus is the “son of God,” then it should be Mary who should belong to the house of David.
    And in:
    You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.
    Luke 1:31 (NIV)
    And who was Jesus’ father?
    He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David. Luke 1:32 (NIV)
    “will be called” – As you have read it, Jesus was only a son or a descendant of David not a real son of God;” he was just a man.

    Is it true that Jesus is a son of David? Let us read in:
    A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham- Matt 1:1(NIV)
    Now we can see that the prophecy in 2 Sam7:12-14 about a coming descendant of David and not a son of God has been fulfilled.
    Considering the prophecy in II Samuel 7:12-14 that if the descendant of David commits a wrong or an iniquity, he will be punished with the rod of men. Was Jesus-the descendant of King David punished by the rod and floggings of men?

    All the people answered, “Let his blood be on us and on our children!” Then he released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified. Matthew 27:25-26 (NIV)
    Indeed, Jesus was flogged by men which when we read again what God stated in the prophecy in 2 Sam 7:14: “I will be his father, and he will be my son. WHEN HE DOES WRONG, I WILL PUNISH HIM WITH A ROD WIELDED BY MEN, WITH FLOGGINGS INFLICTED BY HUMAN HANDS”
    We can discover for ourselves that based on what God said in the prophecy that the real reason why He allowed Jesus -the descendant of king David to be beaten by men was not for our sins but for his (Jesus) own wrongdoing.

    It appears now that the Apostles-the writers of the New Testament who claimed that Jesus was sent by God to be beaten for our sins were hiding from us what really happened to Jesus. Worse than that, the apostles made us worship Jesus -who in reality was punished by God for his own wrongdoing!

    How will God hear our plea of peace and salvation if we worship the one whom He has punished! We are indeed cursed as written in Deut.11:28 because we worship a false god made by the apostles. It is a shame that we even question God why we are suffering today.

    The truth is we allowed ourselves to be deceived by the teachings of the apostles! The pastors would say it was King Solomon who was prophesied in 2 Samuel 7:12-14 but he wasn’t flogged by men when he committed sin against God. It was Jesus -the offspring of David – who was flogged and beaten by the rod of men. Isaiah 53 was never a prophecy about Jesus but a recollection of what Moses did, for Moses was the man to whom God revealed His Arm of Power(Exo.32:11) Read this link: http://www.thename.ph/thename/revelations/suffvant-en.html.

    Since the religions made us worship Jesus who- as based on God’s word in the prophecy in 2 Samuel 7:12-14 was punished by God for his own wrongdoing and not for our sins as the apostles claim, it is clear that we were taught by the religions an erroneous teaching about God. This is why God does not hear the prayer of the peoples of the world for peace but continues to let mankind suffer from all these wars and disasters because they are calling on a false god made by the apostles.
    To know what wrongdoings Jesus had done which the apostles had hidden from us- kindly read this link: http://www.thename.ph/thename/revelations/greatestdeception-en.htm

    THIS IS THE GREATEST EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT THE RELIGIONS ESPECIALLY THE CHURCH AS THE GREATEST CRIMINALS OF ALL TIME FOR THEY MADE MANKIND BELIEVE THEIR TEACHING ABOUT JESUS AS A SAVIOUR WHEN WE CAN READ IN THE BIBLE THAT HE WAS PUNISHED BY GOD- THEY MADE PEOPLE WORSHIP A MAN WHO WAS PUNISHED BY GOD!!!

    I look forward to the day when your organization will use the revelations in http://www.thename.ph and make the whole world know through your influence in the Media as the POWERFUL evidence that will imprison these Church leaders-the false teachers of God’s word.

    Thank you.

  2. Thank You Benaiah for your message. I went through it and it seems interesting. However I would like to call out one basic premise: “The vibration of Prime Creator is not of fear. It is love and all expressions of love are its form”. The essence of our being, The Spirit is of unconditional love and that is who we are. So I request you to rethink and revaluate the argument that “God is to be feared”. God does not punish. He/She/It is not of revengeful nature. Karma is an important lesson to understand and is observed and applied in truth and in nature. There is Free Will at play and you sow as you reap.

    Now I would also like to propose an alternate view of accounts of what has occuured with the purported events regarding Christainity. My claim is that the Catholic church created a composite character of name “Jesus Christ” in what came to be “The New Testament”. The resemblance in life accounts of Jesus and Yeshua in the New and Old Testament are very similar. Now Old Testament was written somewhere 1400BC – 400BC as we know.

    Additinally there are certain historical accounts that Jesus traveled to India and studied in Taxila university whereas others strictly deny it. There is an old forgotten temple in Kashmir/Afghanistan area that records his arrival there. Those in the East at that time worshipped Krishna, which in Greek is called Kristos from which the word Christ came. Naturally there are other accounts of this character that deny he had anything to do with travelling to India.

    I site this taking into account that the Popes over the years have agreed to the 14 accounts of plagirisims in the Bible but did not specify what these were. The real secrets about all of this lie in the Dead Sea Scrolls which the Israeli government and Roman Church have locked up.

    Following is an excerpt I have taken from the Book: Breaking Sacred Grounds written by Alex Collier. It is a free ebook that you can find on internet or even in this blog if you search “Alex Collier”.

    So here goes:

    Q: Well, it’s apparent that there were several characters in history with the name Yeshua, translated loosely as “Jesus”. There’s Yeshua Ben Joseph, etc. How did all this develop?

    A: Basically what happened was that the Catholic church created a composite character, because at the time they were expending a lot of resources putting out religious wars. It seemed like a good idea at the time, but like many things it got perverted. Yeshua Ben Joseph, was a Jewish rabbi who lived from 70BC to 9 BC. He was apparently crucified at some point, charged with being a thief. Prior to that there was a man by the name of rabbi Hallel who
    apparently died in 100BC. Rabbi Hallel was called “The Great Teacher”. Many Christians are led to believe that a man named Jesus was called this, when in fact it was Rabbi Hallel. Now, what happened was that the New Testament composite character of “Jesus The Christ” was created by the Council of Nicea. Most of the words that are attributed to this composite character, referred to colloquially as “Jesus”, were in fact spoken by Apollonius of Tyana, who the Bible
    calls “Paul of Tarsus”. Because Rome had their armies scattered all over the place and all these wars were over the subject of religion, what the Council of Nicea decided to do is essentially create a “State Religion”. So, what they did was combine the religions of the east and the west, both of which were concerned with Sun worship. Those in the West worshipped Hesos, also called Hess. Those in the East that worshipped the Sun worshipped Krishna, which in
    Greek is called Kristos. The very first “Bible” that was put together in 325AD. They took some books that Apollonius of Tyana had brought back from Burma, called the Codes of the Initiates (which concerned themselves with man’s relationship to the seasons, among other things) containing lessons that were handed down to those particular Holy Men in India during that particular period in history. The Codes of the Initiates allegedly contained words that were
    spoken by Krishna. The very first “Bible” was called the Helios Biblios, which means “The Sun Book”. This is what they did in the very beginning.

    Q: When was the Helios Biblios assembled?
    A: Between 324 and 355 AD, by the Council of Nicea under Emperor Constantine The Great. Then they slowly developed a “God”, a personage, to replace the Sun, and slowly changed the books, disposing of the material detailing reincarnation and many of the other teachings. They changed meanings, and every scribe that worked on this thing kept changing things as belief systems were revised with the prevailing times.

    Q: How about things ascribed to the historical “Jesus” such as the Sermon on the Mount?
    A: The exact words ascribed to the historical “Jesus” with reference to the Sermon on the Mount were found in a Turkish museum, authored by a Greek Senator in 64 AD. The Church went out a gathered all the information they could at various times in history, and they suppressed what they didn’t agree with or what they didn’t want the people to know.

    Q: Then, who was the healer in this whole scenario?
    A: That was Apollonius of Tyana, who the Catholic Church referred to as the “Anti-Christ”, despite the fact that he was also known as Paul of Tarsus, mainly because he encouraged rebellion against Roman tyranny.

    Q: And Yeshua Ben Joseph?
    A: From what I understand, he was of the royal line, but he tried to create rebellion against Roman tyranny as well.
    Now, there was also another Yeshua.

    Q: Another Yeshua?
    A: Yes. It was a very common name than in Judea. He was a rabbi who was also a rebel, of sorts. He died at Massada in 64 AD, and his presence at Massada was why Massada was attacked. His name was Yeshua Malathiel. The bottom line is there was no “Jesus Christ” in history at all. It was a composite character, and history reveals this fact.

    Q: Now, Robert Morning Sky revealed that the specific crucifixion that involved a Yeshua was a mock crucifixion, in that the person did not really die, because he was given an herbal mixture to simulate death, and that Bar Abbas was in fact the son of the Yeshua concerned here.
    http://www.andromedaninsights.com/dsg1/chapter7.html (41 of 48) [9/18/2000 6:39:32 PM]

    A: Yes, if you take the name Bar Abbas, which is a two-word name (not Barrabas, as in the Biblical product of the Roman Church), and you go back to the ancient Hebrew, it means “Son of the Teacher” or “Son of the Master”.

    Q: So whose son was Bar Abbas?
    A: Yeshua Melethiel.

    Q: His son.
    A: Yes, and from that grew the lineage in France.

    Q: The lineage in France? That is where Alex Christopher’s book Pandora’s Box picks the trail up. The so-called “bloodline of Christ” that related to the mission of the Templars.
    A: That’s right. It related not to Yeshua (Jesus) Malathiel himself, who died at Massada in 64 AD, but to his son, Bar Abbas, who survived and went to France.

    Q: This is also connected with the “blue-bloods” and extraterrestrial genetics?
    A: That’s exactly right.

    Q: So Yeshua Malathiel was a “blue-blood”?
    A: Yes, he was, and he was connected to the House of David, and if you go all the way back through the line, through David, and you get to Moses, who was a human-extraterrestrial “half-breed”.

    Q: So, was it Yeshua Malathiel who was involved in the “cross scenario”?
    A: I don’t know for sure. The only place I have heard of the story that Robert is talking about is from a book called Crucifixion By An Eyewitness (which does not at all imply that Robert got his data from that book, just that the book mentions it)
    But, the Essenes were herbalists and knew how to mix potions and knew about this kind of thing. Of course, the real secrets about all of this lie in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

    Q: Which the Israeli government have locked up, or at least most of them, and will only let a few select people see a few of them.
    A: Yes, by the Israeli’s and the Roman Church, because what the Dead Sea Scrolls show, according to the Andromedans, are that “Christianity” and “Judaism” were really one thing, one religion, and they also tell the true story of who Yeshua was, as we have spoken about here.

    Q: Yeshua Malathiel?
    A: Right. Rabbi Wise in the 1950′s and 1960′s did an extensive study of the death warrants and death certificates of those who were crucified during that time period, as the Romans kept records, and the only Yeshua listed as being crucified was a man coincidentally named Yeshua Malathiel, who was listed as a traitor and a thief. Mary of the house of Magdelana was the wife of Yeshua Malathiel. She came from a very well-to-do family who raised doves for sacrifices
    put on by the Pharisees at the temples. I think the book Holy Grail talks a little about that, too. The Jewish tradition was at that time that any man 13 years of age, who was a rabbi, must take a wife and have children. That was the law.

    Q: How did the crucifixion scenario arise with Yeshua Malathiel and his son, Bar Abbas?
    A: Well, the story behind that is that they took Bar Abbas because they knew that the father, Yeshua, would come after his son. The story goes on to say that a ransom was paid, and they did a “mock” crucifixion in order to hide the fact of a payoff to the Romans. Malathiel did not leave the area. He continued to do what he did and died at Massada. There is apparently a scroll which is in the possession of the Russians that proves this, and the son, Bar Abbas, was escorted to France with the rest of the family.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 549 other followers

%d bloggers like this: