| Roman Church admits the Pope’s Guilt: Joseph Ratzinger to Evade Justice and Hide out in the Vatican for his own legal immunity and “protection”

Exclusive Breaking News: Friday February 15, 2013

12 midnight GMT

An Urgent Update from the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) – Brussels


In a statement to Reuters today, Vatican officials announced that Joseph Ratzinger will remain a permanent resident of Vatican City after his resignation. Doing so will offer him legal protection from any attempt to prosecute him in connection with sexual abuse cases around the world, Church sources said today

“His continued presence in the Vatican is necessary, otherwise he might be defenseless”.

This startling admission of guilt by the church is also a direct obstruction of justice, and lends more weight to the charge by the ITCCS and others that the Vatican has arranged with the Italian government to shield Ratzinger from criminal prosecution, in violation of international laws ratified by Italy.


The Vatican decided today to give permanent sanctuary to a proven war criminal by allowing Joseph Ratzinger to obstruct justice and evade prosecution for crimes against humanity. And the government of Italy is colluding in this abrogation of international law.

This decision validates our claims about the criminal conspiracy surrounding Ratzinger and his Vatican co-conspirators. It also makes it clear that the Vatican is a rogue power that is flaunting every law to conceal its own criminality.

In response, the ITCCS calls upon its affiliates and all people of conscience to use our upcoming Easter Reclamation Campaign to converge on Rome and the Vatican to force the extradition of Ratzinger from Vatican City, and place him and his accessories on trial for crimes against humanity.

Commencing Sunday, March 24, 2013, our activists and others will begin an escalating series of Catholic church occupations and seizures of church property to bring about Ratzinger’s extradition and reclaim stolen wealth from the criminal corporation known as Vatican Inc. – in the name of the legion of their victims, both living and dead.

.. and from Kevin Annett – The Rat Scurries Back to Vat!

Those whom the gods destroy, they first drive insane. Especially, it seems, in Rome.

Why would the oldest and wealthiest institution on our planet deliberately prove what its critics say about it, by first tossing their leader, a proven crook, out of his office after he’s threatened with arrest, and then giving him shelter to avoid prosecution? That’s the kind of panic and illogic displayed by a junior document-shredder, not a credible or wise body of men.

And that gives all of us hope.

Rome’s incredible admission that they can’t have the Pope stand trial has strengthened our cause and legitimacy enormously,  proving that no matter how big is your guilty opponent, provoking him for long enough will cause him to destroy himself by his own fear and stupidity.

Protecting Ratzinger within the walls of the Vatican may halt justice for a moment, but it violates a basic rule of warfare, which is to never give your enemy a permanent focus for their attack. Ratzinger, the evil Emperor, now a permanent fixture in the Vatican? The absurdity of offering such an ongoing focus to the civilized world’s hatred of catholic criminality is also a sign that the church is adrift and improvising. But it also shows how genuinely worried is the Vtaican about the legal offensive mounted by our affiliates, lawyers for torture survivors, and the International Criminal Court.

The Vatican is pulling out all stops to keep Ratzinger out of court. Their loyal, one-man owned Italian media is assaulting the crap out of yours truly and our ITCCS these days, playing the “Deny, Distract and Discredit” strategy of any damage-controlling corporation.

Tottering Liz Windsor, aka Queen of England, is making a special and unprecedented trip to Rome on March 6 to kiss the ring, or other parts, of the new CEO of Vatican Inc. And Italian President Napolitano is meeting with President Obama today in Washington to undoubtedly line up more American backing for the Pontiff – not that Obama needs much encouraging, having stood loyally behind Ratzinger’s claim of “diplomatic immunity”.

But all to no avail, ultimately. When the Bloody Emperor stands naked, only our illusions keeps him protected and immune from the final accounting that is coming.

The tornado that followed my first exorcism outside the Vatican in 2009, and the lightning that struck it on the day of Benedict’s resignation, were not accidental. Joe Ratzinger should know from the history of his own former SS buddies that criminal institutions can run, but they can’t hide – even behind all the wealth and pomp in the world.

via| The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State.

Posted on February 15, 2013, in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 46 Comments.

  1. I think you and the itccs, founded on malice and lies are all sick. It’s time you all quit this useless posts and do something else with your time.

  2. I’m not sure what exactly you are promoting, but find here the nature of the man behind this farce:

  3. I hope we are both promoting the Truth..atleast with a Conscious Intention with what that Resonates. I checked out your opinion on Mr. Annett but I will not judge a man by a court decision as I know it can be manipulated. I will only judge, if at all, by someones actions and so goes the same for The Vatican. Any fight against the Vatican Crimes and their inhumane practices is a good fight.

    Anyhow, if there is any credibility to ITCCS then it shall come in front of all peoples eyes when its time has come. Until then, we continue to promote awareness to the Vatican Crimes.

    • “Any fight” appears extremist to me. Sometimes there is a fight where there is no fight. A court verdict with numerous witnesses does not hold water because it can be manipulated, but Annett’s witness stands. I would encourage you to go back and read the so-called press release detailing why the Pope abdicated/resigned. Look at the dates, claims and inherent inconsistencies (better you find them). Place them against the earlier link … and then visit this page where you will find the rest of the links that are not “court” procedures:

  4. Any fight appears extremist to you? So fight against evil is also Extremism? Any fight is extremist when one takes to violence. Silence against evil only encourages evil.

    For me this is a an information war which the puppet mainstream media has been generally suppressing by not giving the attention it deserves by not providing adequate coverage. However even the mainstream has been forced to “discretely” report many cases of molestation of children by the churches all over the world and the use of secretive Vatican banks to launder money. I can understand the vendetta then against Annett by The Powers That Be/Were for taking them on. itccs has no athourity on its own but if it takes the due course of action through the ICC and if the ICC and takes according action it becomes legit. Recently there has been spate of charges against the Vatican but instead the pope openly chooses to hide in Vatican instead as being duly reported. Can you explain to me why he seeks protection from the Italian President?

    Also I understand your concern is the legitimacy of Annett and itccs but to me the bigger concern is the crimes committed by the powers in Vatican over the years. Here is a link from wikipedia about the human remains of genocide of Mohawk (aboriginal) children that were found in the Church premises in Canada: and this link about the Canadian Indian residential school system run by the Church and closed in 1970s:

    • >>Can you explain to me why he seeks protection from the Italian President?<<
      I couldn't but help laughing. You seriously think he is seeking protection? Woah, then something is terribly wrong in whatever you are getting from wherever! If as Pope he didn't need protection, do you think he would have resigned if he needed one? Or do you think the claims of Annett – even if indeed he did what he claimed – were sufficient to rouse the Pope from a slumber? Then you must be living in a dream world. You guys must think this Kevin more than he has ever dreamed to be – which is "very big".

      At the risk of repeating myself, Kevin did not as much as send ANYTHING to the Vatican, and is now looking for someone to help deliver whatever he calls it to the Pope in the Vatican. If you believe him so much, you might want to volunteer and do that for him. He is posting on a blog under another name here (

      That apart, you surprise me if ever you think that the mainstream media "discretely" reports anything Catholic when it's negative! Has any religious body, Christian or not, received worse bad press than the Catholic Church? Perhaps you don't follow … I do. I have had to personally correct certain reports due to things I know and follow – even if they do so without apology!

      Charge of money-laundering? There was none. Check the records again: banking was done according to certain principles not in agreement with EU reguations – an old style of things… EU regulations are still "new", but those have long been resolved and "updated" so why the noise?

      Look, seriously, there is a difference between fiction and fact: it is yours to choose. Follow what you will – I can't change that for you. Looking at the blog's name, I thought truth was sought …

      Here is what the Reuters article you referred me to says:
      >>It was added to the list because it was considered vulnerable to money-laundering and had recently established programs to prevent it, a State Department official said.
      “To be considered a jurisdiction of concern merely indicates that there is a vulnerability to a financial system by money launderers. With the large volumes of international currency that goes through the Holy See, it is a system that makes it vulnerable as a potential money-laundering center,” Susan Pittman of the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement, told Reuters.
      Last year, the Vatican adapted internal laws to comply with international standards on financial crime.<>Vatican police, who already know the pope and his habits, will be able to guarantee his privacy and security and not have to entrust it to a foreign police force, which would be necessary if he moved to another country.
      “I see a big problem if he would go anywhere else. I’m thinking in terms of his personal security, his safety. We don’t have a secret service that can devote huge resources (like they do) to ex-presidents,” the official said.
      Another consideration was that if the pope did move permanently to another country, living in seclusion in a monastery in his native Germany, for example, the location might become a place of pilgrimage.<<

      Check your news … I say again

      • For some reason, not all what I sent appeared.
        I noted: You do ont seek protection where a protection already exists – which nullifies the claims of Annett.
        HP article was doctored. Find the actual Reuters article here ( Vatican officials don’t speak on conditions of anonymity, and even at that, the three reasons supposedly given by the so-called official (as appeared in the earlier response), have nothing like that.

      • Vatican is “vulnerable” to money laundering by not implementing the security features that are required by International Law to discourage money laundering.

        This should make you laugh my friend. Vatican Bank with all its huge slush funds for the biggest politicians in the world would not be complicit in the Money Laundering itself. Naww! It is a just victim by not reporting huge chunks of money being transferred to its accounts. This should make you laugh. The biggest bank is just “lazy” to implement security measure right?

        That is how MSM reports misadventures of this rich. If you are not careful, they will make the hunter look like a victim. Hope you can begin to read between the lines. If it it was a small broker who would become a “Victim” of money laundering, would be sitting in jail.

        And if the pope is such a great person, why would he need a secret service type protection after retirement? I thought being a man of god would mean being loved by all, wouldn’t it? Do all priests move around like politicians now? And I wonder how hard it is to arrange a security in another country! Hmmm. He could not come up with his own money to arrange one I guess..

        • Look Kevin, come out and be you. If Kevin has bad character, it does not matter. But others do, and it matters.
          You call to evidence articles, then you denounce them as reporting in favor of the rich and powerful – what they have almost never done for the Catholic Church. I’m waiting for you to give the list of the “rich and powerful” who put money in the Vatican bank. I happen to know who puts money in the Vatican bank that is not Vatican – and they are not individuals, neither are they civil entities.
          >>> I thought being a man of god would mean being loved by all, wouldn’t it?<<< Evidence is to the contrary. Too many nutcases like you who would take a shot at a man of God just because that is what he is.
          Take your sorry self out of what you do not know – and please expunge from your twisted mind all the conspiracy stories forming therein. If you read my posts, I have successfully shown that:
          1. You are without cridibility as you want the world to believe
          2. There was nothing like a seeking of immunity as you claimed
          3. Claims of money-laundering are lacking anywhere
          4. You are sick and need psychiatric help.

          I will pray for you – get out of the world in your head and live in the real world.

  5. If for say itccs statement is true and they have been able to forge aliance with ICC then it makes perfect sense that he retires and hides in Vatican as he will not be able to continue travel for his duties as a Pope.

    • Yet there is nothing at the ICC – you can check with them. I can give you the help if you need it.

      • So noone takes a hit from the mercenaries of Vatican! I would imagine something of this magnitude cannot be done openly as the pressure is implied through channels. That is why itccs did not name which country it is using as its affiliate. itccs itself has no recognized authority so it can speak openly, with a lesser risk of being targetted.

        • Look Kevin, come out and be you. If Kevin has bad character, it does not matter. But others do, and it matters.
          You call to evidence articles, then you denounce them as reporting in favor of the rich and powerful – what they have almost never done for the Catholic Church. I’m waiting for you to give the list of the “rich and powerful” who put money in the Vatican bank. I happen to know who puts money in the Vatican bank that is not Vatican – and they are not individuals, neither are they civil entities.
          >>> I thought being a man of god would mean being loved by all, wouldn’t it?<<< Evidence is to the contrary. Too many nutcases like you who would take a shot at a man of God just because that is what he is.
          Take your sorry self out of what you do not know – and please expunge from your twisted mind all the conspiracy stories forming therein. If you read my posts, I have successfully shown that:
          1. You are without cridibility as you want the world to believe
          2. There was nothing like a seeking of immunity as you claimed
          3. Claims of money-laundering are lacking anywhere
          4. You are sick and need psychiatric help.

          I will pray for you – get out of the world in your head and live in the real world.

  6. Oh, by the way, I discovered this blog here is operated by the same person operating this ( I wonder how it took me so long!

  7. Lol. I see how your logic works. Anyone who claims to be on the same side as Kevin Annett IS Kevin Annett. Like the person who posts in lucas2012info blog.

    Show me proof Kevin Annett was involved in genocide, child sex abuse, money laundering. I showed you the same for the Vatican yet you continue to lick their sorry ass.

    If the nutcases like me are threat to pope, then trust me he do not need security.

    Honestly, you claim to be following up with lot of stuff written about the Vatican but the stuff I shared wth you, you act like you read it for the first time. You are incapable of reading between the lines which shows you are largely unaware of what is going on. Perhaps you are a paid shill of the Vatican who want to discredit Kevin Annett in the alternate circles. Trust me you do a pathetic job.

    I shared the media reports as you asked me where did they ever report. Well they reported. As it can be seen clearly, they are never truthful and clear in their reporting about Vatican crimes, but that do not people ppl cannot see the truth if they choose to. I only shared one link, There are others, NBC, Guadrian, EUTimes etc reporting on these crimes. It is not my job to send u all the links If you want to find the truth, find urself.

    This is my blog and I share the Truth that I know it is. No need for you to comment if you do not agree.


    • Perhaps you share the truth as you think it – not what is. You shared a report: there was no mention of what you thought was there – I didn’t see it, neither were you able to point it out to me. Instead, you asked me to “read between the lines”. Why does your sorry mind – if there is – read what is apparently not in a report (just like your headlines) and then you want someone who is not as sick as you are to think the same way?

      As it were, I gave you sufficient evidence of Annett’s instability – which was convenient for you to dismiss with a wave of hand – wasn’t it? And you call on me to give you evidence? “a paid shill”? Why does your sorry mind think that there are not people who care about correct info except it is tied to money? A projection of the self?

      • I asked you to read between the lines when the media is trying to show Vatican Bank as a victim of money laundering rather than the party that is complicit in the crime. When you are in banking business, you are required to take measures to stop money laundering.

        But then the laws are for the little people to follow, Not the ones who are too big and above the law. That is why I support Kevin he takes the fight to those that are above the law. Ofcourse he will be attacked by people like you.

        And hello, did you read the headline on the articles i shared? The headlines say it all for the intelligent.

        • Lol self projection of a paid shill? I did not know Kevin Annett is also rich like The Vatican!

        • Comprehension is that difficult for you? Because anything and everything is money for you, you think others are concerned about money too? There are some people who don’t have to worry about money all their lives – oh, and it is not my making, neither is it yours – it just happens.

        • A lil correction, it is about the crimes of the rich and wealthy who pretend to be do gooders of the world but exploit little children and do genocide everywhere.

        • That again sounds like Annett’s words … But in case you do not know, you are inadvertently writing of Annett, of whom a denunciation was made:
          “That in print and in word you have raised monies designated to send Victims of Residential School Abuse to Geneva, given no notice that you, a non-victim of Residential School Abuse planned to use some of the monies to send yourself, and that you have conflicting accounts of the actual amounts raised and given no actual accounting of monies raised, by whom they were donated and how many Victims could be sent to give representations to UN bodies about Canadian Residential School Abuse and Genocide in Canada;” (

        • “I asked you to read between the lines when the media is trying to show Vatican Bank as a victim of money laundering rather than the party that is complicit in the crime.” There was NEVER A CRIME … so the issue of victim or complicity would not arise. The EU only sought ways to MAKE the VB comply with its own rules too, if it wanted to do business with it as an EU nation. This is why I think your “reading in-between the line” is a deomonstration of sickness.

          Seondly, you make headlines “Pope Seeks immunity” for instance. In the article, there is nothing of such – nothing to point to the fact that there was any act like that. But of course, there can’t be because he already had immunity!

        • “I asked you to read between the lines when the media is trying to show Vatican Bank as a victim of money laundering rather than the party that is complicit in the crime.” There was NEVER A CRIME … so the issue of victim or complicity would not arise. The EU only sought ways to MAKE the VB comply with its own rules too, if it wanted to do business with it as an EU nation. This is why I think your “reading in-between the line” is a deomonstration of sickness.

          Seondly, you make headlines “Pope Seeks immunity” for instance. In the article, there is nothing of such – nothing to point to the fact that there was any act like that. But of course, there can’t be because he already had immunity!

  8. So for you it is not a crime until it is charged by a court and is punished. To me, a crime is a crime when it is committed. The courts, the governments and the media are largely bought of or blackmailed or threatened. So when a person takes on someone big and influential, dirt is hurled at his face. The media will not say “THIS IS A CRIME”. If that was the case, I would not need to start this blog.

    • The mainstream media is ALWAYS too glad to proclaim to the whole world the crimes of the Vatican, proven or not proven. IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY A MAN OF TRUTH – OR AT LEAST SEEKING THE TRUTH, YOU CAN AT LEAST CONFIRM THIS! In this case, not even “suspicion” of crime is reported – only as you have read in-between the lines! How smart of you!

  9. Oh no buddy, msm only reports a part of the story, not the whole. If they did, then noone wud ever trust this Vatican and u wud not be here writing on my blog. They only discretely report a story on child sex abuse and do not follow up.

    I do not think you want to see the truth. You just here to throw dirt on those who do.

    • Here is a short 6 mins NBC video of Pope seeking immunity for sex abuses cover up.

      • What language do you understand most? I’m not sure it’s English … Puedo explicar todo en espñol para ti si quieres. NOT ONE WORD is uttered even regarding the Pope’s life after resignation, not to mention seeking immunity. Or you are again “reading in-between the lines” – or listening this time? Or perhaps you didn’t even watch it?
        I’ll tell you what you don’t understand. I have been closely following the action of the Vatican since Ratzinger took over cases in 2001. If that man could put himself at a firing squad and victims would be healed, he would. ANYTHING! But I do it for fun, so who would listen to a fun boy who has no worries? Instead, they seek twisted minds to satisfy their biased curiosity.

        En todas maneras, your putting forward of “a short 6 mins NBC video of Pope seeking immunity for sex abuses cover up” where there is nothing of the sort only confirms in LOUD terms your state of mind. Best wishes

    • If you think the Vatican relies on the press for credence then you must have come from an alien world. I’ll give you a tip: Go back to 2010, read all media reports first, about the impending visits of the Pope to Britain – the videos are available too. Read or watch what the media wanted projected even as he was there … and then read their sorry reviews when the visit was over. That’s the real world and relationship of the MSM and the Catholic Church … and yet it keeps moving.

      You know what? I am proudly a member of the Roman Catholic Church – by conviction – not because anyone is there, or anyone says anything. The Pope can come out on Wednesday and tell the whole world that he is actually the devil – it will not alter one bit of my faith: the Institution does not matter to me. I have come very far in my journey to worry about Institutions. I try to correct what I know, but that institution does not even need my sorry support to stand!

  10. My friend, Its never been the question about your faith. Thats ur personal thing. I hope u mean it when u say u do not tie urs to the Vatican. Otherwise u’d be lying to know..(Second Personality)

    So, Vatican is above Media. I am already agreeing with u there and u r with me. They own all the major media in all Europe US and rest of the “Free World”. All we have then is the alternate blogs to find the truth.. So you connect the dots for urself and I for me. The truth only then lies in each of our perspectives.

    What else we have in common is it concerns both of our freedom. But where we differ is I see Vatican a threat to mine. Not Kevin Annett. So I chose to focus on the crimes of those that are hidden.

    And wht evidence do u have against Kevin? A court case? What does that prove? Court cases have been fixed for long time in all of the world. The victims are bought and sold. A court case does not become a validation of Truth.

    And what exactly did Ratzinger reveal since he took on all the Child Sex Cases since 2001?

    • Oh my! I’m laughing …the Vatican owns the mainstream media? The own all mejor media? I guess that is your honourable answer to the question I asked you regarding the video you posted: congratulations! Now, it is either you are utterly ignorant or a serial liar … you can choose any one of the two. But I feel really sad for you. May God open your eyes.

      some of you have chosen Kevin Annett, an egoistic serial liar? (I think I have presented sufficient documents to prove that). Now is beyond “court-fixings” as you choose to call it. What about all the people who know Kevin personally and have now declared (even challenging him) that he lied to them? In case you didn’t read them all, here is one person’s remarks with her name – and can be contacted in a list with a telephone number I put in a previous post:

      “Pte Hinsila Ska
      August 30, 2012 at 20:39 (UTC -5)Link to this comment
      I have a few statements to make. First of all I’d like to start with Nell Cole. When it is convenient, responsibility for her actions, which directly contribute to genocidal reality for every surviving Native on Turtle Island, whimpers away. I have never in all my life encountered a more lost, pathetic, attention thirsty little girl, a little girl who absolutely has NO SOUL. She puts the entire white race to shame, and feigns oblivion when she sells out the red. I could write a definitive essay on the mental and spiritual illness of this creature alone. However, Annett is the important matter here. Harriet Nahanee and I spent a valued 24 hours after the Tribunal at her house, where she confided in me – and the others present – the truth about Kevin Annett. As well, I had spent an intense five days in deep communication with her during the Tribunal. Let it rest for once and for all. Everything Harriet was trying to expose about Kevin – and all the other survivors that I was present for as Juror at the Tribunal were desperately trying to expose as well – are true. He stole their testimony, abused them in every manner, is guilty of every crime named by all over the entire years of his career of fraud. He is a moral criminal of the lowest sort, a spiritually depraved man. No one has been more shocked into the rude awakening of truth regarding Kevin Annett than me. I had been his most staunch and historically oldest supporter ever. I have known him longer than anyone left alive. His wretched, alcoholic, violent, mentally ill father is a newbe on the scene – and Kevin despises him, but does not tell him. Instead he uses the old horrid man. And the horrid old man uses Kevin in agonizing desperation to redeem a wretched and utterly wasted life. With regard to the red race, Kevin Annett deserves – and here I appeal urgently and seriously to all responsible citizens of the human race – to be held accountable for War Crimes himself to the Indigenous Peoples of the Western Hemisphere. I helped put him on the map.”

      As to what Ratzinger did when he took over in 2001, I am satisfied and can say proudly that no one (government or Church institution) has done even a third of what he did in the 4 years before he became Pope, handing the responsibilities to someone else. That is sufficient, and anyone who wishes to speak the truth will acknowledge as much. Keep with Annett, a man of multiple personalities – I have only one!

  11. Your last comment just told me you only pursue truth from one dimension. Hence your blind faith in Vatican. You are happy with the showman this Rat does. The millions of kids that were molested do not. Not a single of Vatican Clergy brought to justice? Is this the “Free World” for you? It is not for me..

    The Vatican is continuation of the Roman times and been in control since then through its operations with Monarchies all over the world, the Rothschilds Central Banks (its media). Vatican mantains to this day its secretive operations through the Jesuits, Knights of Malta along with secretive Masonic societies for its covert operations. It is a top down organization. Like every top down, there is a head. A kingpin. The elections that you will see soon are sham. In truth it will be chosen. By a bigger head. The secretive Black Pope who most have no clue about.

    You keep harping about a court case. You must have a lot of faith in the system. That is why you keep bumping into Kevin Annett everywhere and believe he has multiple personalities. Haha. I feel bad for you..May you meet one that wakes u up..

    • There is a websearch service called Please, do a search of “defrocked Catholic priests” between 1980 and 2000; then 2001- 2008, then tell me when more defrocking took place, especially as related to sexual abuse. Abuses that people refer to most often are not really what can give us the versions of the two parties because they were in the 50s and 60s … only a few of these men accused were living when Ratzinger took over – and he didn’t shield one! My sources of info are mine – and I love them, so long as they are verifiably valid and truthful.

      I do not blame you for reading too much of Dan Brown’s fictions with Knights and Jesuits, etc. There is a longer list. But that is what the world thrives on; picking fiction and making it fact. You should pay attention more to tiny scripts (that is, if you actually read the novels not just the films) where the author says the work is fiction!

      I only gave you one court case. You are the one going on incessantly about a court case – all others are denunciations of the native people out in Canada. If the “Court” (properly tribunal) case agrees with the mountain of testimonies of the Natives, either individually or collectively, it only confirms my position and negates yours. For a man I happen to know is not stable, I need no media to tell me his state of the mind. The man is a nutcase, simple, and you can once more confirm with thousands he has duped in the name of helping, and instead, built an image for himself on false pretenses!

  12. Great idea. If you use this new webservice you mentioned, you will also get many hits on the Jesuits and the rest of the clan. More than Dan Brown and much more than Fiction. These guys are very good at mixing truth with lies. They give us bit of truth which is inherently known to a few and call it a fiction so the average (not you) believes them to be lies.

    By the way, I really did not find any instance when anyone had suffered a Jail time. Do you know in US everytime a teacher is caught in a sex act with 14-15 yr olds they are always sent to jail? We hear this in news very often.

    It is not for me to make you believe the truth. It will be revealed to you when you are ready for it.

    However your mountains of testimonies w.r.t Annett look like a small hill in front of the Peaks of testimonies of millions of children worldwide who have been systematically abused in an organized crime fashion by the Churches and Government (its a culture these secret societies promote in order to rise higher in ranks) all over the word. Of this recently in news was a huge chunk of UK parliament members (in government) and by those in high positions in US (cpl yrs back reported 5200 pentagon employees purchased child pornography) who all form this sex/human trafficking ring of which your beloved Vatican is a kingpin!

    • Trouble with you is you keep jumping from one to the other. Annett is “into the dustbin”, that is settled. I have tried to demonstrate to you that what you called pointers to your claims are either false, doctored or unsubstantiated. If there is no jail term for a defrocked priest who molested children, it is that he is dead. A better search will bring out a few who were actually imprisoned. And this holds true for all teachers who abused children in the past … You sure would have ready jail terms now. Child abuse is always bad, and should be punished. Demonizing someone over affairs that happened donkey years ago is however evil. Last year we uncovered certain abuses in the past that did not make it to the press in Belgium: the Police was behind it all. This give you a glimpse into the world of that time: reporting was as useless as the act itself. In fact, in this case, police gave advice to people how to shield abusers! But when reports are made of the Church not reporting abuse, such sociological factors are not taken into consideration.

      I have been rather patient with you. Now you are making another claim: Vatican kingpin of sex/child trafficking. Congratulations. You just got my attention. I have known the Vatican for fighting these crimes all over the world. You are giving me information to the contrary. Is this only found in your head (a trait common with Annett) or you can actually substantiate it? Give me the figures, the evidence.

  13. The evidence you seek is what Annett has provided in itccs. That is a part of form of testimonies. The other part is for people to accept mainstream is to bring Vatican to justice which he is working on.

    The internet is flush with this truth, and if you ask the right questions, you will get the right answers. To understand the truth, you will need to study the true history that is not being taught in the classrooms except those to the privileged, the elite. All truth is connected and when you understand the entire truth, you will not need evidence.

    For starters I give you the this link..If you are really interested to know but I doubt you do..
    So it will be upto you to believe..

    They can hide the truth for now, but it will not be hidden forever.

    • There must be something horribly wrong with you mind: I asked you a question to substantiate the claims of sex/child trafficking and you send me a link about conspiracy theories of what Jesuits did or are doing? Boy! I have better theories than that … and even though I don’t particularly like the Jesuits, what is found on those pages is TRASH! Are you giving me the evidence I ask for or just want to troll around?

  14. Like I said, you are not ready for it. I have given you the complete picture if their atrocities. There is more, if you ever came across David Wilcock read his stuff. He has given plenty of evidence. I am not fighting some court battle with you where I have to provide evidence of everything I speak, My life does not depend on justifying everything to you. Please take some time and do ur own research with an open mind.

    • You sure haven’t a more open mind than I do. When you make a claim, you substantiate it. Sick people all over the world make claims all the time of how some mifia or the other is after them, or how they plan to takeover a government … yet it is all in their heads. Boy! I have been doing independent research for a very very long time, academic and otherwise … and I don’t count the cost! You don’t send me trash that is at best stuff for psychiatric patients and ask me to go through. In the end, Vatican involvement in “sex/child trafficaking” is just in your head. I could visit with the psychiatric patients in downtown hospital if and when I’m in the mood for such trash as you offer. By the way, there is more room there for your types … my family give lots of money to support you guys there.

      Best wishes with your UFOs and other conspiracies

      • What you call is the Trash is the truth you do not want to see as you have built your web of lies with effort you put in junk you have been researching..

        The reason you find so many similarities with what I say and with Kevin Annett is for those who speak the truth speak the same language. That is what that connects us. When you manage to take lies out from your system, the connection will be automatic.

        Looks to me you already spending too much time in a psychiatric ward. What you need is a let out.

        • There ia an African proverb that says “when you are in a shower and a mad man takes your clothes away, you don’t run after him … people will say see those two mad men.”
          I thought you were redeemable, but evidence has shown otherwise. It would have been fuun to have an impartial person to read and evaluate the posts here, and tell us who makes sense. You are nauseating. Just before they turn you into the psychiatric hospital, do a quick post: I’ll send you a check to buy you latest UFO sightings. Cool, huh?

  15. Lol, so now you want to play a name calling game. I hope this is not how you like to make yourself feel good. The evidence you seek is all in front of you. But what good are those eyes that only sees lies.

    You ridicule the talk abut UFOs, Vatican Crimes, World Wars and the Central League of Nations that were instituted that has kept the planet in perpetual state of WAR ever since for one person. Control.

    But then you cannot let your illusion shatter as if you begin to believe it then all the work you have done until today and stood for what you believe, collapses. That is hardly a symptomn of an open mind.

    What you study the truth as a whole then you see how it is all connected. Then you will find the evidence you seek. Id repeat, David Wilcock is a good place to you can start seeing the connecting pieces. If you are not interested then stop claiming you want to see the evidence. You need to understand ur history to start understanding evidence.

    • Are you referring me to the same David Wilcock who asserted that a greater number of persons were going to ascend in 2012? Perhaps you did … I didn’t. A BA in Psychology? What research has he had more than reading and watching lots of Sci-Fi and then imagining and making claims? Any idiot gets ratings by proposing strange stuff … those don’t built the mind, they destroy. I was a better imaginary fellow when I was 7 than Wilcock.

      I have not ridicled any Vatican Crime (nor any other stuff you attribute to me) – Instead, I have denounced or forms of abuse – remember? I have called for evidence for claims – which is what people who live in the real world outside of Sci-Fi and Conspiracy theories do. Get real!

  16. Regarding Ascension, David Wilcock never claimed everyone will ascend on Dec 21 2012. What he provided regarding that is his interpretation w.r.t Change of time from Age of Pisces to Aquarius and its significance. People interpreted Ascension with what they wanted to believe. What he did claim is it is not a doomsday as that is what media and hollywood focussed on w.r.t this date.

    To me the timeline is relevant as we are indeed in a new age. I feel that in this new age whatever is hidden will come to light at a faster pace. Doesn’t get better with the resignation of the Pope.

    This indeed is happening as the frailties of our current Economic/ Banking system is becoming more and more apparent. It is also becoming clear now that Govt favors the Big Banks and Corporations and not the freedom of the folks in the “Free World” as that goes against their profits and control systems.

    As more shit happens, more truth is revealed to the peoples consciousness. Eventually when we have enough masses woken up, the Power of Love then overthrows the Love of Power. That will be our Ascension as we then create our Garden of Eden hear on Earth. The only thing that stops us is the control system in place, primary with the money which the very few can create to infinity and charge us massive interests to keep us enslaved. So with money they control everything.

    Of all Davids work, three things stand out for me. His work on the “Financial Tyranny” which gives lot of insightful information with evidence on the secret Masonic societies as well as their connection with Vatican, Banking and Monarchies. If you understand this much then you can further your research on other links. His book Investigations of Source Field is an exceptional scientific piece as it brings new concepts which the mainstream science overlooks particularly with the everything they cannot explain as they think Physical Matter as the source of everything. He provided the proof of existence of Source field which is Source of all Love and Matter which the religious associate as God. It is again a matter of understanding this truth. On his spiritual front, his work on The Common Law or The Law of One – Channelings with Ra is exceptional. I found it resonated with so much on many different levels things I already knew about my connection to the source and it added on to it.

    Another piece that stands out (not Davids work) is the House of Rothschilds and how they came into prominence and control over the last 300 years. Truth is today they control much of the so called “Free World” through their system of Central Banks and their League of Nations called the United Nations.

    And my friend, they have a good reason to suppress information about it is also related to control system. There are hundreds of testimonials from high govt sources who want to reveal this to people but the msm suppresses. We must ask why all this information is being suppressed. Look Roswell Crash, Phoenix Lights. Look Dr Stephen Greer and the work he is doing to bringing all this to light.

    Now you don’t believe there is all that Smoke without a Fire do you?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: